Sunday, November 14, 2004

Hunting for roaches

The headlines coming from US media seem to indicate that our military is getting ready to declare "Mission Accomplished" in Falujah. Well, I'm not there with them, but sometimes a longer perspective appears called for in determining whether success can actually be claimed.

25 years ago I lived outside of Washington, D.C. in Old Town, Alexandria, VA. Prior to that I had lived for 5 years in Lexington, Kentucky. Both places where I lived had roaches. You wouldn't see them if you were actively roaming around the kitchen, but early in the morning or late at night, if you turned on the light to go in, there they would be, scurrying under cupboards and refrigerators, hiding out. I'd fumigate for them frequently, but they would just move to other parts of the apartment buildings and come back a week or two later, no worse for wear.

And that's what I think is going on in Fallujah. Our forces (which according to 7 retired generals in the current issue of rolling stone magazine, are way undermanned: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/_/id/6593163?pageid=rs.Home&pageregion=single7 ) cannot wipe out the roaches in Iraq because they lack the ability to cordon them off and round them up. As I write this, the very last of them are no doubt scurrying to Mosul, or Baghdad or a hundred other places where they can hide out before their next unmanned bomb or sniper attack on our forces. Those civilians unlucky enough to have been trapped in Fallujah (and make no mistake, the US forces violated international law by refusing to let civilians leave prior to the offensive's start this past week) provided probably the majority of the casualties. The blog site Baghdad Burning ( http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com/) has news of this as does an article in Scotland's press. http://www.sundayherald.com/46056 They make for horrific reading.

We have not stomped out the roaches in Iraq. We have only created more.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

As as in Viet Nam, our friends and our enemies look exactly the same. But surely these Iraqis will start to cooperate once they realize that bush has a mandate.

Delatuchi said...

So what do you suggest we should have done. Should we have left Saddam in power so he could have tortured more children, gave more money to terrorist, or so he could simple keep threatening the safety of the US. Nobody said that war was simple, we need to keep hitting these cowards that hide behind inocent women and children.

moe99 said...

No, I believe in the concept of just war, which, to simplify for the purposes of this blog, proscribes war except where the country has been attacked or there is imminent danger of same. Unfortunately, we are not nursemaids to the world, and cannot stop each and every atrocity. There is also cause for going to war if there is genocide going on, but there is nothing from the record to support the genocide charge, unless you want to go back to the Bush I administration when he PERMITTED Saddam to exterminate the Kurds Bush I had encouraged revolt. But we missed that opportunity in '91.

moe99 said...

and now comes word that the Pentagon is trying to claim that there were NO civilian deaths in the Fallujah offensive. Well here's more rebuttal in addition to what was posted originally:
http://tinyurl.com/5uonk